Someone from Google Made $1M on Polymarket (Insider Trading?)

With AdQuick, you can now easily plan, deploy and measure campaigns just as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.

You can learn more at www.AdQuick.com

A bombshell investigation has revealed what appears to be insider trading on Polymarket, the decentralized prediction market platform. An anonymous trader profited approximately $1 million in a single day by betting on Google search-related markets, with transaction patterns strongly suggesting access to non-public information about upcoming Google announcements.

The trader, operating under the pseudonym on the blockchain-based platform, placed massive bets on specific outcomes related to Google's search engine updates and feature rollouts just hours before official announcements. The timing and precision of these bets—combined with the trader's perfect prediction accuracy across multiple Google-related markets—has sparked intense scrutiny from both the crypto community and regulatory watchdogs.

Red Flags in the Trading Pattern:

The Regulatory Gray Zone:

Polymarket operates in a regulatory gray area. Unlike traditional stock markets with clear insider trading laws, prediction markets exist in largely unregulated territory. However, legal experts suggest that profiting from material non-public information—even on a decentralized platform—could still violate securities laws if the underlying information relates to publicly traded companies.

Platform Response:

Polymarket has built-in mechanisms to detect unusual trading patterns, but the decentralized nature of the platform makes enforcement challenging. The platform's terms of service prohibit trading on insider information, but without traditional KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements on fully decentralized markets, identifying perpetrators remains difficult. Industry observers note this case could become a watershed moment for prediction market regulation.

Broader Implications:

This incident highlights growing concerns about information asymmetry in prediction markets. As these platforms gain mainstream adoption—with total trading volumes exceeding $10 billion in 2025—questions about market integrity, insider access, and regulatory oversight are becoming increasingly urgent. The case may prompt lawmakers to extend existing insider trading frameworks to cover prediction markets explicitly.

Further Reading:

Google has unveiled Gemini 3 Deep Think, a new extended reasoning model designed to compete directly with OpenAI's o1 and o3 models, Anthropic's Claude with extended thinking, and DeepSeek's reasoning capabilities. The model represents Google's strategic response to the emerging category of AI systems that "think before they speak"—spending additional compute time on complex reasoning tasks.

Gemini 3 Deep Think is optimized for multi-step problem solving, advanced mathematics, complex coding tasks, and scientific reasoning. Unlike standard large language models that generate responses in a single forward pass, Deep Think employs chain-of-thought reasoning that's visible to users, showing its work as it arrives at conclusions.

Extended Reasoning Architecture:
Deep Think can spend up to several minutes processing complex queries, breaking them down into logical steps and evaluating multiple solution paths before responding. This "slow thinking" approach mirrors human problem-solving for difficult tasks.

Performance Benchmarks:

Transparency Features:
Unlike some competitors, Gemini 3 Deep Think exposes its reasoning process to users. You can watch the model break down problems, consider alternatives, and self-correct—providing insight into how conclusions are reached. This transparency is particularly valuable for education, research, and debugging complex systems.

Scientific Research:
Deep Think excels at hypothesis generation, experimental design, and analyzing complex datasets. Researchers at Google DeepMind report using it for protein folding predictions and materials science applications.

Advanced Coding:
The model can architect entire systems, debug complex codebases, and optimize algorithms. Early enterprise users report 40% reduction in time spent on system design tasks.

Mathematical Proofs:
Deep Think can construct formal mathematical proofs, verify logical consistency, and discover novel problem-solving approaches. It recently solved several open problems in combinatorics during internal testing.

Strategic Analysis:
For business intelligence and strategic planning, Deep Think can model multi-variable scenarios, evaluate trade-offs, and provide detailed reasoning for recommendations.

Gemini 3 Deep Think operates on a usage-based pricing model that reflects its higher computational requirements:

The model is available through Google Cloud's Vertex AI platform and the Gemini API, with a gradual rollout to Google Workspace users planned for Q1 2026.

Gemini 3 Deep Think enters an increasingly competitive landscape. OpenAI's o3 model set new benchmarks in December 2025, while DeepSeek's V3.2-Speciale achieved gold-medal performance in mathematical olympiads. Anthropic's Claude Sonnet with extended thinking offers similar capabilities with different architectural approaches.

The differentiation comes down to specialization: OpenAI optimizes for breadth, DeepSeek for mathematical reasoning, Anthropic for safety and alignment, and Google for integration with enterprise workflows and scientific applications.

While Google hasn't disclosed full architectural details, Deep Think appears to employ a mixture-of-experts approach combined with reinforcement learning from process feedback. The model learns not just to reach correct answers but to follow reliable reasoning paths that generalize across domains.

The system includes a "confidence calibration" mechanism that estimates certainty levels for different reasoning steps, allowing it to identify when additional computation would improve accuracy versus when it has reached a reliable conclusion.

Further Reading:

Apple Inc. is experiencing an unprecedented leadership crisis as four top executives announced their departures within a 72-hour window, marking one of the most significant talent hemorrhages in the company's modern history. The rapid-fire resignations span critical divisions including artificial intelligence, design, policy, and legal—raising questions about internal turmoil and strategic direction under CEO Tim Cook.

The exodus began with the departure of Apple's AI Chief, followed swiftly by Alan Dye (Head of UI Design) joining Meta, then the shocking resignations of Apple's Policy Chief and Head of General Counsel. Industry analysts describe the simultaneous departures as "highly unusual" and potentially indicative of deeper organizational issues.

1. AI Chief Steps Down

Apple's head of artificial intelligence and machine learning departed amid reports of strategic disagreements over the company's AI roadmap. Sources familiar with the matter suggest tensions over Apple's cautious approach to generative AI and delays in bringing competitive features to market. The departure comes as Apple faces mounting criticism that it has fallen behind competitors like Google, Microsoft, and Meta in the AI race.

2. Alan Dye Leaves for Meta (Head of UI Design)

As detailed in previous reporting, Alan Dye—Apple's VP of Interface Design since 2015—announced his move to Meta's Reality Labs division. Dye will become Chief Design Officer for Meta's new creative studio, taking with him nearly three decades of Apple design DNA. His departure represents a continuation of the design team's erosion since Jony Ive's exit in 2019.

3. Policy Chief Steps Down

Apple's Policy Chief, responsible for navigating increasingly complex global regulatory landscapes, resigned citing "personal reasons." The timing is particularly notable given Apple's ongoing battles with EU regulators over App Store policies, antitrust investigations in multiple jurisdictions, and escalating tensions over encryption and privacy standards. The departure leaves a critical vacuum as Apple faces some of its most significant regulatory challenges.

4. Head of General Counsel Resigns

Perhaps most shocking is the resignation of Apple's top legal officer, who has been with the company for over a decade. The General Counsel oversees all legal matters including intellectual property, litigation, compliance, and corporate governance. Sources suggest the departure may be related to disagreements over Apple's legal strategy in ongoing antitrust cases and the company's approach to regulatory compliance.

Internal Tensions Over AI Strategy:
Multiple sources point to frustration over Apple's conservative AI approach. While competitors rapidly deploy generative AI features, Apple's privacy-first philosophy and quality-control standards have slowed deployment. Some executives reportedly felt the company was losing competitive ground.

Post-Jony Ive Identity Crisis:
Since design legend Jony Ive's departure in 2019, Apple's design philosophy has been in flux. The recent "Liquid Glass" interface—met with mixed reviews—represents a departure from classic Apple minimalism. Design team veterans may be questioning the new direction.

Regulatory Pressure Fatigue:
Apple faces unprecedented regulatory scrutiny globally. EU's Digital Markets Act, DOJ antitrust lawsuits, App Store payment disputes, and privacy legislation across multiple countries have created an exhausting compliance environment. Policy and legal leaders may be experiencing burnout.

Cultural Shifts:
Insiders describe growing tension between Apple's traditional secrecy culture and the need for faster, more transparent development cycles that AI requires. Some executives reportedly felt constrained by legacy thinking.

Apple's stock experienced modest volatility following the announcements, though long-term investors appear to be taking a wait-and-see approach. However, the simultaneous departures raise serious questions:

An Apple spokesperson issued a brief statement: "We're grateful for the contributions of our departing executives and wish them well in their next chapters. Apple has deep bench strength and a strong leadership pipeline. We remain focused on delivering the best products and experiences for our customers." The company announced Stephen Lemay would replace Dye, while searches for the other positions are reportedly underway.

Further Reading: